[C-safe-secure-studygroup] Can we make this list public, please?

[McCall, Gavin (G.F.)]

+1

(do I do +1, or +2?)

-----Original Message-----
From: C-safe-secure-studygroup [mailto:c-safe-secure-studygroup-bounces at lists.trustable.io] On Behalf Of Martin, Robert A. via C-safe-secure-studygroup
Sent: 03 January 2017 12:40
To: Paul Sherwood <paul.sherwood at codethink.co.uk>; c-safe-secure-studygroup at lists.trustable.io
Subject: Re: [C-safe-secure-studygroup] Can we make this list public, please?

+1

On 1/3/17 7:34 AM, Paul Sherwood via C-safe-secure-studygroup wrote:
> Hi all,
> picking up on David's comment [1] that we should aim to negotiate 
> early with ISO if we hope to achieve wide adoption by avoiding a 
> paid-for output, please can we consider having the existence and 
> archives of this list open to public view? That way, the body of work 
> of these discussions is clearly free without need for negotiation, and 
> I think this would set the scene for discussions with other bodies 
> (MISRA, for example).
>
> Does anyone object to this?
>
> Can we get a round of +/- 1 votes?
>
> br
> Paul
>
> [1]
> https://lists.trustable.io/cgi-bin/mailman/private/c-safe-secure-study
> group/2016-December/000018.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> C-safe-secure-studygroup mailing list
> C-safe-secure-studygroup at lists.trustable.io
> https://lists.trustable.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c-safe-secure-stud
> ygroup
>

_______________________________________________
C-safe-secure-studygroup mailing list
C-safe-secure-studygroup at lists.trustable.io
https://lists.trustable.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c-safe-secure-studygroup