[trustable-software] Our thoughts on OpenControl and Mustard

[Paul Sherwood]

On 2016-10-10 12:11, Jim MacArthur wrote:
<snip>

A further question in this thread... I'm about to try to define (or 
retrofit) the functional and non-functional requirements for some 
software tooling. In particular I want to record things like

- foo must do bar
- foo needs to complete in x seconds
- multiple instances of foo can be run on one machine
- foo can be used on a range of operating systems including at a 
minimum x and y

etc.

Ideally I'd like to do this in a lightweight structured way, in YAML, 
and have the possibility that we could also consider the applicability 
of some external compliance requirements (eg SIL, NIST) for foo.

Based on what you've established so far, would it be better for me to 
start this work in Mustard, or OpenControl, or something else?

br
Paul