[trustable-software] Exploring the "Hypothesis for software to be trustable"

Paul Sherwood paul.sherwood at codethink.co.uk
Wed Jan 3 09:58:36 GMT 2018

On 2018-01-03 09:38, Duncan Hart wrote:
> This might be getting a bit ahead.... do you have a candidate language
> to describe the requirements?

Hah :)

> -- Duncan Hart --
> January 2017
> Melbourne, Australia
> On 3 January 2018 at 20:31, <trustable at panic.fluff.org> wrote:
>> Andrew,
>> I'm interested to see in inclusion of 'Concise' within this
>> list. How do you imagine we can measure 'Concise' ?

Edmund - so far I haven't concluded that we need to be able to measure 
everything. If you believe that we *do* need to measure something like 
this, can you justify why?


More information about the trustable-software mailing list