[trustable-software] Exploring the "Hypothesis for software to be trustable"

Munns, Jon jmunns at jaguarlandrover.com
Wed Jan 3 10:19:16 GMT 2018


Agreed anyone?

On 3 January 2018 at 10:14, Paul Sherwood <paul.sherwood at codethink.co.uk>
wrote:

>
>
> On 2018-01-03 10:09, Rob Kendrick wrote:
>
>> >>I'm interested to see in inclusion of 'Concise' within this
>>> >>list. How do you imagine we can measure 'Concise' ?
>>>
>>> Edmund - so far I haven't concluded that we need to be able to
>>> measure everything. If you believe that we *do* need to measure
>>> something like this, can you justify why?
>>>
>>
>> If you take "concise" to be an absolute rather than a variable quality,
>> you can measure it by seeing if you can find a shorter alternative
>> wording that is as equally comprehensive.
>>
>
> If we insist on this, I think we'd be creating more work than it's worth,
> though?
>
> _______________________________________________
> trustable-software mailing list
> trustable-software at lists.trustable.io
> https://lists.trustable.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/trustable-software
>



-- 
Kind Regards,

Jon Munns MBA
Chief Engineer Vehicle Domain Controller
Jaguar Land Rover Electrical
Int Tel: 8794 9812
Tel: +44 7880 401 047


Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Registered Office: Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry CV3 4LF
Registered in England No: 1672070
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.trustable.io/pipermail/trustable-software/attachments/20180103/7870537b/attachment.html>


More information about the trustable-software mailing list